Blog Archives

What Scriptures or Writings did the New Testament Saints have?

4/25/2016

1 Comment

A recent discussion on a FB page brought to light a common misconception regarding the writings available to the early believers. I have heard it questioned or stated more than once that these folks had no scriptures to study. The discussion questioned the need to spend time studying the bible rather than just reading it or even not reading and receiving enlightenment directly from God. It becomes clear that this belief stems from a lack of even a cursory reading of scripture, mainly in the books of Acts.

Others wonder that the earliest men of the bible, such as Abraham, had no scripture yet knew what God wanted through direct revelation. They claim that if it was good enough for Abraham, then why not us, today? This is an accurate position regarding God speaking to Abraham or Moses, but certainly it is not regarding us today. 2 Timothy 2:15 commands us to "rightly divide" the scriptures. The failure to rightly divide, through the lack of study, leads us to take everything in the bible and claim it as our own. God deals in ages and dispensations. Certainly Abraham had no scriptures, but we do! God deals with humanity in different ways in different times. Once one studies these separation marks or points in scripture, the ease of understanding increases.

Today, I would like to point out just a few references that show, clearly, the early believers had scriptures. In fact, these scriptures existed even before Jesus was born!

Jesus makes reference to Psalm 118:22-23 in Matthew 21:42. Jesus states or asks, "Have you never read in the scriptures". From this we can gather that the Psalms were available. Matthew 21:23 gives us those to whom Jesus spoke, the elders of Israel. These writings were primarily available to the religious leaders of Israel and were read aloud in the temple. However, others also had at least some of the scriptures.

After the resurrection, as Jesus was walking to Emmaus, he talks with men disappointed that Jesus died and did not redeem Israel. In Luke 24:27, Jesus again mentions that men had not read the scriptures or understood them. Scriptures did exist. Not only did they exist, but in this passage, verse 32 says that Jesus was explaining the scriptures to them; these men had read the scriptures themselves and completely missed the prophecies concerning the messiah.

Speaking again to the religious leaders of Israel, Jesus, in John 5:39, mentions the study of scripture. The leaders studied scripture though they, like others, missed what they were studying regarding the messiah.

Even the Ethiopian eunuch had at least Isaiah to read. Acts 8:26-34.

In Acts 17:2, 3, Paul enters the synagogue and teaches Christ from the scriptures. These would have been Old Testament prophecies concerning Christ. In Acts 17:10, 11, we read of the famed Bereans who studied the scriptures themselves to find the truth. These particular believers were Jews and apparently they had access to at least some scriptures in the temple.

Acts 18:24-28 gives an example of a Jewish believer named Apollos. He was from Alexandria in Egypt. We have no indication that Apollos was a Jewish leader, yet he had studied scripture, enough so that he was able to debate religious leadership in the temples, eloquently. It is likely that Apollos had a copy of either all of the Septuagint or at least parts of it. The Septuagint, or LXX (for the 70ish Jewish translators) was a Greek language translation of the Hebrew writings. This translation was started approximately 300 years before Jesus was born! It was finally completed around 130 BC. The reason for the translation was the expansion of the Greek culture in the area which included the Greek language becoming a main form of communication. Apollos likely spoke primarily Greek, as did many Jews from Egypt. The cost of owning such a book would have been high unless Apollos was educated as a scribe or was able to copy the LXX himself. Again, we have evidence that scriptures were available and that they were studied. A man such as Apollos was not traveling and preaching from a book he had simply read from, Apollos was very knowledgeable in the scriptures.

Paul makes many references from the scriptures throughout his writings. In Romans 15:4 Paul notes that they are for encouragement. In 1 Corinthians 15: 3-7, Paul notes that the entire cross work of Christ was shown in the scriptures, these being of the what we call the Old Testament. Paul tells Timothy in 1 Timothy 4:13 to publicly read the scriptures. Timothy was not an Jewish elder, yet he had copies of the scriptures. 2 Timothy 3:16 and 17 tells us what scripture is for and why.

When Paul tells Timothy to study, he certainly meant to go beyond reading. Scriptures were available to those who desired them. As time progressed the scriptures became more widely available. We know of the unfortunate periods when scriptures were held back from the common man but we now have access not only to the Old testament but to Paul's writings as well. We have no reason not to study as God desires. The scriptures are there for us to know who God is. We will certainly make mistakes, many will come to differing conclusions and at times these beliefs will cause division as even happened in Paul's day (Philippians 4:2). Paul was rejoicing when Christ was preached. Beyond the gospel of salvation we should not argue but openly discuss together.

If you take the time to look using key words like scripture, you will find other references in the new Testament that show they were available. Further study will bring exact examples in the form of either direct or indirect Old Testament quotes used by Jesus, Paul, and others.

1 Comment

Openness Quote... The 'Eternal Now'

4/25/2016

0 Comments

I am currently reading an excellent book called Did God Know, A Study of the Nature of God by H. Roy Elseth.

In chapter 8 titled God Lives in Time, on page 88, Mr. Elseth includes a quote by Gordon C. Olson. I thought it explained well the biblical case of God living in time, rather then out.

"The theological dogma that God is an 'eternal now', or that time or succession is not an element in the Divine existence, is evidently a philosophical rather than a biblical concept. In the bible God is presented as a living being who walks or dwells with men, performs definite acts at definite times, who rests, observes, thinks, and is reasoned with, remembers, is grieved, is jealous, is provoked to anger and then causes His wrath to rest, is moved to compassion, who forgives and comforts, delights and rejoices, hearkens unto men, repents, changes His plans, makes new decisions, etc. These various acts, states of mind, or experiences obviously conflict and cannot coexist at the same instants in a particular series of events, and thus require the chronological element of time for their occurrence."

Wonderfully stated!

0 Comments

Exhaustive Foreknowledge- Expectation Gone Wrong

4/15/2016

0 Comments

"What more can I do for my vineyard
beyond what I have already done?
When I waited for it to produce edible grapes,
why did it produce sour ones instead?"

Most Christians would probably say that God will always get what God expects. Why? Because God plans out everything, so why would He not get what He expected? This seems fairly reasonable if God truly orders every action, every happening, and every motion leads to what God has planned all along. There are however at least two instances where God does not get what He expected.

Isaiah 5:1-4 gives a very nice, and honest, example of something not turning out as God had expected. I say honest because some will say that God is not being honest at all. The common thought is that God already knew the outcome; if so then why even use language that would seem to imply God was surprised? That, at least to me, does seem honest. God is honest, right? Of course He is; so when the scriptures use language that indicates that God is surprised by the outcome of a situation then I believe it.

Isaiah speaks of God singing a song about His true love, Israel. The picture is of a vineyard which is very well cared for. As with Job, there is a hedge about the vineyard to protect it from wild beasts and those who would destroy it. Think of the Judges; when Israel was under a Judge things went well, they were protected. When the Judge died, Israel went astray and the protection fell away with terrible consequences. The adversary complained to God that Job was protected and this was the reason that Job worshiped God. The difference is that Job did worship God when protected by the hedge, Israel on the other hand did not.

One would expect that a vineyard so well cared for would produce very fine grapes. The husbandman was none other than God. This vineyard had divine protection and nurturing. What else could possibly happen beside perfection? Sour grapes, the unexpected. The husbandman is certainly surprised and dismayed. Isaiah 5:4 describes this unexpected turn of events. Just as in Jeremiah 3:7 where God thought something would turn out a particular way, it did not. In Isaiah, God sincerely asks, or wonders, what more could I have done? God seems to be going over a list in His mind, checking off all He has done to ensure sweet wine grapes. It would appear that everything possible was done yet the result was far less than satisfactory.

Way back in Exodus 33:5, God had a similar problem with Israel. God had to ask, 'what am I going to do with you'? At that point God decided not to travel with them based on what little he had seen already. This seems to be a recurring issue in their relationship, God's and Israel's. God asks a similar question in Hosea 6:4; God asks what is He to do with them? The case in Hosea certainly seems to be more of a sarcastic question, if you read the book you will understand why.

So by now you might be wondering how is it possible that God did not know the vineyard would yield sour grapes? God genuinely thought that at some point the relationship would work out for the good that He expected. Clearly, it did not.

Isaiah 5:7 gives us at least some of the reason why the hedge is to be removed. Israel is unjust to others and those they oppress, from among their own kind, are crying out to God for justice. Things that God definitely expected not to happen among a people that He provided, protected, and cared for so deeply.

"What more can I do for my vineyard
beyond what I have already done?
When I waited for it to produce edible grapes,
why did it produce sour ones instead?"

I believe this verse is an honest assessment of a situation which God had not planned on. Therefore, God was genuinely surprised and honestly wondered what could have been done differently. The answer is nothing, God did all He could. What does God desire? Hosea 6:6 gives us what God was looking for all along.

Hosea 6:6 NRSV
For I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings.

Steadfast love, the kind God gave Israel, is what God expected. In a true relationship there are two people and both must be completely involved for the other for the relationship to be fruitful. Israel and Judah both failed to be faithful so God walked away from the relationship, at least temporarily.

0 Comments

Gehenna (Hinnom Valley)

4/14/2016

1 Comment

Some claim that Jesus spoke of hell more than he spoke of heaven. Is this really true?
When Jesus spoke of hell, the few times that he actually did, he was speaking of a specific place that was well known to those that were listening. In the gospels Jesus is speaking primarily to a specific people, the lost house, or sheep, of Israel. There are many places we can go to understand this.

In Matthew 15:24 Jesus said that, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

Jesus instructed his disciples in Matthew 10:6 to "Go nowhere among the Gentiles, and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

The gospels are more properly associated with the Old Testament as Israel is still the key that God is using for the salvation of the world. We see the need to become a Jewish proselyte well into the book of Acts to be able to enter the kingdom. This does not really change until the final rejections of the Messiah by the Jews through the Acts period and finally in Acts 28 where the apostle Paul states with final authority that he will go to the gentiles. Why is this so important to understand? We need to know who is being spoken to if we want to understand a particular passage. This is very important regarding "hell" as Jesus used the word.

Using the KJV, we find Jesus mentions hell 17 times and, incidentally, he used the word heaven 168 times. So, Jesus did speak of heaven far more frequently. Of the 17 mentions of hell Jesus used two specific words; Gehenna and Hades. Two words for hell and both are completely different places. If both are two separate places then why translate them as one word? Earlier we saw that Sheol, a Hebrew word for the grave or unseen place, is also translated as hell frequently but not always. There is even a fourth word that has been translated as hell in the Bible but it will not be discussed today.

Let's focus on Gehenna as it is the word used with slightly more frequency by Jesus, 11 times out of 17 in the KJV. It is also notable that I mention the KJV specifically; in its various forms of the 1611, the KJV3, and the modern KJV, hell appears in differing numbers. Really? Yes! Do some research on this one. If you continue to search you will find some translations actually use the word Gehenna and do not even have the word hell in their entirety. Two notable and popular translations are the "literal" Young's and Rotherham Bibles- no hell to be found.

Matthew 5:22 is the first occurrence of Jesus using the word hell. If you have a concordance look up the word hell and find its index number which is g1067. Look to the index of Greek words and you will find the word Gehenna is associated with g1067. What exactly is Gehenna?

According to Jeremiah 7:31 Gehenna is called the valley of the son of Hinnom. God says, "And they go on building the high place of Topheth, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire--which I did not command, nor did it come into my mind." The children of Israel were following a sacrificial custom of the gentiles which burned their children alive in the hands of the god Molech (Jeremiah 32:35), or Topeth. Also see 2 Kings 23:10.

Where was Gehenna, or this valley of the son of Hinnom? In Jeremiah 19:2 God commands the prophet to go somewhere and speak; "and go out to the valley of the son of Hinnom at the entry of the Potsherd Gate, and proclaim there the words that I tell you." The Potsherd gate is one of the gates of Jerusalem. The valley is south of the city. Later in verse 16 God changes the name of this horrid valley to "the valley of Slaughter".

We now have a word, Gehenna, which is an actual place that has historical meaning for the Jews. It was a place that God was disgusted with due to its use and God was also disgusted with His people for doing such an abomination. It was a place of burning children. The god was represented by a very large statue of metal that was also a furnace. This furnace was kept continually burning. The fire went up the interior heating outstretched hands where the children were laid bound.

Some claim that the valley eventually became the city dump where trash was burned continually and that the bodies of the unlawful who were not fit for burial were burned there as well. Others claim that there is no evidence of this. Either way, the valley was known by the Jews as a place where people were bound and laid on hands of fire for sacrificial reason to a god of pagans, a ritual the Jews copied and performed outside of there own city. This knowledge becomes very important to us as we read the passages where Jesus makes reference to Gehenna. It will become apparent that Jesus is not making reference to an place of eternal torment!

Disciples in danger!

Matthew 5:21-22 KJV
(21) Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
(22) But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

Matthew 5:1 tells who Jesus was talking to, it was not the masses but his disciples. The masses followed Jesus and he escaped them by going up the mountain where hos disciples found him. The following verses are spoken to the disciples. It appears at first glance Jesus is giving them a stern warning about some of the reasons one might end up in hell. I often wonder why Adam was not given such a talking to. Interesting as well that Cain, the first murderer, was banished from his homeland but never threatened with hell.

What actually happened then to these tragically murdered innocents? They died. They perished. When one perishes they are no more. What a sad situation Israel found themselves in.

So, Jesus tells his disciples, not the masses, that if their eye or hand offends, pluck it out or cut it off and throw it away. The implication is made that by doing so they can avoid being tossed into an eternal burning hell. If they call their brother a moron or idiot, they may suffer hell as well. What does Jesus say happens to one who is thrown into hell fire? They perish, they die. And what kind of death is one suffered in hell fire? A worthless death. Consider the word that Jesus used when he spoke "hell"; he actually was saying Gehenna. The "Gehenna of fire" or "Gehenna fire" would have been the phrase. It is now interesting to note that some translations actually use the word Gehenna. How much does this make sense! It really does because sometimes Jesus used the word Hades instead which gives an entirely different meaning.

Matthew 5:22 EWB-Companion Bible
(22) But I say unto you, That every one that is angry with his brother without a cause shall be liable to the council of three in the local synagogue:and every one that shall say to his brother, You ! , shall be liable to the Sanhedrin: but every one that shall say, Thou wicked reprobate, shall be liable unto the Gehenna of fire.

What happened to those thrown onto the hands of Gehenna fire? They died a worthless death. Bullinger's Companion Bible is the KJV with some revisions. The point is that the use of the proper name gives all of the meaning we need to understand, and it is NOT about burning forever in hell.

Gehenna as a place used from the result of Judgement

Jeremiah chapter 7 is a warning of what might come upon Israel should they not repent. The warning is tied to Gehenna, the Valley of the son of Hinnom, or the valley of Topeth. The nation of the north will come through and utterly devastate Jerusalem. The death toll will be such that the bodies will be buried in this valley, so many that they will run out of room. The bodies will be so many that they will not be buried and will be food for birds and wild animals. As others pass by Jerusalem and see this they will be appalled! Read Jeremiah 7:31 and 32.

Jeremiah 19:8 NRSV
And I will make this city a horror, a thing to be hissed at; everyone who passes by it will be horrified and will hiss because of all its disasters.

Isaiah 66:24 similarly mentioned a fire that is unquenchable, a fire that is burning dead bodies. These are the bodies that are dead and tossed in the valleys surrounding Jerusalem due to the judgement of God. This actually happened! The disciples would know of this. Mark 9:43-48 draws from Isaiah regarding the unquenchable fire. The danger in Matthew 5 is not of eternal burning in a mythical hell which was invented by Jewish sages during the time between the Testaments, but of the results of judgement. Jesus is simply stating, get right, walk right, it is better to do so then to face judgement.

Josephus in his Wars of the Jews book 5, chapter 12, verse 3, states that during the Roman siege of Jerusalem the Jews were no longer able to bury the dead in the city. These unfortunate dead were thrown over the walls into the valleys surrounding the city where they rotted.

So, we can connect Gehenna fire with human sacrifice and a valley in which the bodies of Jerusalem will be thrown due to the lack of burial space after God removes His hand, or hides His face from them, so they will face judgement. One action they will face judgement for is burning their sons and daughters alive. These are the visions that fill the disciples minds when Jesus speaks of Gehenna fire, not an eternally burning fire. We can also say that this example involves Jews only, not gentiles. Finally, we can see that not only was this a historic fact that the Jews could relate to, it was something that happened again to which Jesus himself prophesied (think the narrow and wide gates).

There is much more to this topic that can be looked at another time!

1 Comment